A really awesome essay I just read. Here are my callouts:
Here’s what angers me the most, though: It’s that you can’t see, or refuse to see, that this distinction between intent and impact is the very same distinction to which you appeal when you blame Trayvon for his own murder or when you blame rape victims for their own rapes. You are saying, in effect, Trayvon may not have meant to get shot, but he should have known that wearing his hoodie up like that would make him look threatening to the world. He should have known better. How is that not the same distinction? Why do you get to use this distinction against Trayvon, an innocent child, without anyone getting to use it against you when you try to explain away the actions of the man who killed him? Why? Why does Trayvon or any other person of color have to carry cognitive and volitional burdens you don’t? Why are your comfort and ease and your precious feelings and your ability to mouth off whenever you want about whatever you want so damned important? Why do black kids have to learn to pay for your peace of mind and self-esteem by having to worry about whether what they are wearing might contribute to them getting hunted down in the street? Why is this a privilege you get and he doesn’t? Why can’t you see that this is as blatantly unfair as saying that some spaces are whites only? Why?
In case you’re wondering folks, that is what white privilege is.
Some of you may be thinking, “Brian, you’re not just saying that everyone has to be mindful of what they say and think. You’re saying that as a white person I have to be on my guard in a way people of color don’t. You’re saying I have a heavier burden to carry in this respect than they do.” Actually I doubt many of you would put it so carefully. Usually you– not all of you, not going to name names, you will know who you are–simply cry, “reverse racism!”, then fold your arms and think you’ve made your point. Except you’re simply wrong about this. Notice I didn’t say that we have a difference of opinion about this. You are just wrong. A young black man walking down the street wearing a hoodie is just not inherently threatening, unless, of course, you insist on seeing it that way, and that says more about you than it does the man. Saying and thinking “young black men wearing hooded sweatshirts look threatening,” though, perpetuates the notion that young black men just are threatening. The social facts are simply different on either side in a way that tracks a differential distribution of power. Also, let’s not forget the fact that if we are keeping score on who bears the heavier burdens overall under systemic racism, white folks can bear this burden and still come out way ahead.
Goes for most of my readers too!
We white folks do have a big burden to carry in this one respect, it’s true. We have to be very careful and mindful in discussions of race. But this is not the fault of people of color. At all. What is at fault is the fact that the situations in which we find ourselves are constructed in racist ways that give us privileges we haven’t earned. What white folks should be upset about is the racist legacy left to us by our own forbears. We find ourselves in situations where ignorance is bliss and knowledge is sometimes painful. We have to do hard work, because we can get by just fine by looking the other way; we have to sacrifice time and comfort. After doing so, we might still feel awkward. This work isn’t easy.
The LOL moment also from last week: over 50% of whites in a survey think they encounter anti-white racism as much as minorities encounter racism. As reported here by Fox News via Mother Jones.
Fave bit here:
Among Americans who say they most trust Fox News, 26 percent say reverse discrimination is a critical issue, nearly twice as many as say discrimination against minority groups is a critical issue (14 percent). At the other end of the spectrum, only 8 percent of Americans who most trust public television say reverse discrimination is a critical issue, compared to 27 percent who say discrimination against minorities is a critical issue.
Last week, Mother Jones came out with an article about affirmative action as a case is likely to head to the Supreme Court. You can read it here.
Affirmative action has always been a touchy subject for me. I write this blog in the hopes of drawing attention to everyday racism and white privilege and ways to improve the situation, but I have mixed feelings on AA. Here is where I stand (in list tl;dr format!):
- Affirmative action is a government mandate for institutions like work and education to increase racial diversity. But that’s just it, it’s a mandate. There are no instructions on how to accomplish this so several policies exists, most are flawed.
- I used to believe that using race to decided on policies was counter-intuitive to battle racism and why can’t we just ignore race and based decisions on merit? I no longer believe in this ignorant color-blind concept. Racism is pervasive and inequalities based on racial lines do exists. It has been proven. It cannot be ignore away.
- I do not thing affirmative action should be stopped.
- But I do think actions along the lines outlined here in this article should be emphasized:
‘”Previous efforts to curtail what are known as “race-conscious” policies have shown that “universities don’t just throw up their hands and give up on racial diversity,” says Rick Kahlenberg, an education expert at the Century Foundation. “They look to race-neutral alternatives, some of which can produce substantial racial and ethnic diversity.” ‘
A little more on the second point where some believe merit alone should be the deciding factor. The plain truth of the matter is not everyone has equal access to education and money. A large reason for this discrepancy is race and poverty and those are inextricably linked. Yes there are poor whites who might not have had access to this or that (I was one of them!), but poor whites are very much a drop in the bucket if you compare those numbers to those of basically any other race. Race-neutral solutions should be found, but that doesn’t mean we should stop collecting racial information; because if we don’t know there’s a problem we can’t work to solve it.
This is a screen cap of various Facebook statuses where the people feel that this earthquake was somehow redemption for when the Japanese military attacked Pearl Harbor in 1942.
People really disgust me sometimes. Click here for the image, it is very large.
Japan’s population is aging and there’s hardly any young people to fill the worker void. Yet, they don’t want to admit foreign labor and so the economy is failing.
Perhaps this is a lesson for those of us in America who are anti-immigrant labor?